Where I’m at: D.C.
What I’m doing: finishing up another day of French
Why I’m posting: testing the bounds of my native tongue after another day of butchering my new tongue
Perhaps my favorite American has struck again. I am, of course, talking about Sarah Palin. And by “favorite,” I mean I have an emotion for her that must rhyme with “soul-wrenchingly disturbed by her grotesque inability to do anything, ever, worthwhile to promote America as not the dumbest country on Earth.” (Please someone respond in the classic “Celebrity Jeopardy on SNL” style of “light urple.” You tube it. It’s funny.)
Anyway, she once again tried to use the word “refudiate,” which is one of many words she’s tried to invent. For some people, Twitter is a very dangerous thing indeed. Not to mention that it was posted as part of an inappopriately anti-religious (except to Christians perhaps) tweet. The general laughter at her gaff caused her to make another gaff, followed by an attempted salve where she compares herself to Shakespeare (article here: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/07/palin-invents-word-compares-he.html?wpisrc=nl_pmpolitics) and says that English is a living language.
And you know, she’s kind of right. Languages (except Latin) are alive and do change, though I question the wisdom of letting Sarah Palin be the one to change ours. After all, people like Stephen Colbert, Ray Kroc, Steve Jobs, and others constantly add words to our lexicon. So I wonder, who should be allowed to add words to English? Is there an IQ minimum? An accomplishment minimum? A popularity minimum? Can I do it? I mean, I make up lots of words and phrases…should I call Webster’s?
Who said it: Steve Miller, who speaks of the “pompatous” of love